What properties do the numbers p^q
or the numbers p^q ±r, where p,q are distinct primes, have?
Do these things have a name?
(r could be prime or composite.)
p^q is obviously composite; p^q ±r might or might not be prime
The subcase p=2 is pretty well studied, and in particular
the subcase p=2, q=some prime, r=-1 is Mersenne (at least, for the definition which requires the exponent q to be prime)
Folks don’t be afraid of it, it won’t bite, it’s just an idle question, I don’t even know whether there is an answer, let alone one anyone cares about.
p^q is composite and probably boring, unless it has some unlikely properties I’m not aware of other than:
- it obeys Fermat’s little theorem (see also: Carmichael numbers)
- it has (q+1) distinct factors (boring)
- it is a ‘Powerful number’, since q≥2
- it is a divisor of some Achilles number (Any interesting conjectures about p^q and Achilles numbers?)
The numbers p^q ±r are maybe more interesting, and might throw up some prime-generating or other formulas (not necessarily good ones, but hey), other than Mersenne’s formula. I’ve only ever seen p=2 or rarely p=3 used, are there any formulas involving higher primes?
- see e.g. the formulas for even and odd perfect numbers.
- see also Wieferich prime
- related but different: Pierpont primes; Wagstaff primes;
Ramanujan-Nagell equation (
p=2, q not required to be prime, r=-7)
For more inspiration, see "Lists of the first prime numbers of various types"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_special_classes_of_prime_numbers
David – there’s no "right answer", it’s just an amateur question, I’m disappointed people didn’t just have a go at it.
For example, are 5^q ±r, 7^q ±r …
(for r even)
any use as prime-generating formulae?
If not, why is 2 special?
And so on.
Seems to me you would be more likely to get an answer if you ask on sci.math (Usenet or Google Groups).
Seems to me you would be more likely to get an answer if you ask on sci.math (Usenet or Google Groups).
References :
Pingback: kjeric
Pingback: hWinett
Pingback: bvenie
Pingback: Sterker
Pingback: vbsehmer
Pingback: Richelles
Pingback: ghesrker
Pingback: vgteslle